• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
  • Contact
  • Reviews

California Defamation Law Blog

  • Home
  • About
  • Blogs
  • Archive Page
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Services
  • Contact Us
  • (626) 793-8607

Main Content

How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion

July 18, 2022 By Adrianos Facchetti Leave a Comment

It is not uncommon for litigants to challenge costs that were incurred by the other side in connection with a successful anti-SLAPP motion. Code of Civil Procedure section 1032, subdivision (b), provides that except as otherwise provided by statute, “a prevailing party is entitled as a matter of right to recover … [Read More...] about How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion

Anonymous

Twitter Wins One Motion to Quash a Subpoena Seeking the Identifying Information of its User And Loses Another: A Case Study in Dealing With Applications for Production of Discovery for Use in a Foreign Proceeding Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782

January 25, 2020 By Adrianos Facchetti Leave a Comment

Two recent back-to-back decisions involving the same plaintiff and the same magistrate in the  United States Northern District of … [Read More...] about Twitter Wins One Motion to Quash a Subpoena Seeking the Identifying Information of its User And Loses Another: A Case Study in Dealing With Applications for Production of Discovery for Use in a Foreign Proceeding Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782

Must an anti-SLAPP defendant submit declarations in order to satisfy their prong one burden?

May 1, 2018 By Adrianos Facchetti 1 Comment

The Second District Court of Appeals recently issued a significant opinion in Bel Air Internet, LLC v. Morales (2018) 20 Cal.App.4th … [Read More...] about Must an anti-SLAPP defendant submit declarations in order to satisfy their prong one burden?

Recent Posts

Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

June 28, 2022 By Adrianos Facchetti Leave a Comment

Plaintiffs often incorrectly point to their attorney's fees and costs to set the standard for what … [Read More...] about Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

June 24, 2022 By Adrianos Facchetti 1 Comment

In most cases a court is not permitted to consider settlement offers under Evidence Code section … [Read More...] about May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law?

June 20, 2022 By Adrianos Facchetti Leave a Comment

There is no cognizable claim for intentional infliction of physical distress under California law. … [Read More...] about Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law?

Does California’s anti-SLAPP statute apply in bankruptcy court?

June 19, 2022 By Adrianos Facchetti Leave a Comment

Confusion abounds among litigants as to whether and when the anti-SLAPP may apply in a given case. A … [Read More...] about Does California’s anti-SLAPP statute apply in bankruptcy court?

Must attorney-client confidences be revealed in order to obtain attorney’s fees after a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

June 15, 2022 By Adrianos Facchetti Leave a Comment

After prevailing on an anti-SLAPP motion, counsel will file often file a separate motion for … [Read More...] about Must attorney-client confidences be revealed in order to obtain attorney’s fees after a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Primary Sidebar

Some Featured

How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion

Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion?

Recent Posts

May a court adjust the lodestar upward based on exceptional representation?

What is a contingent fee multiplier in the context of an anti-SLAPP fee motion?

Is the reasonably hourly rate capped to what was paid by an insurer for purposes of determining the lodestar?

Follow Us On

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Search

Footer

California Defamation Law Blog

Law Offices of Adrianos Facchetti 4444 W. Riverside Drive, Suite 308, Burbank, CA 91505
California Defamation Lawyer & Attorney of Adrianos Facchetti Law Firm, offering services related to libel, internet defamation, slander, defamation of character, disparagement, anti-SLAPP, personal injury, car accidents, motorcycle accidents, trucking accidents, serving Los Angeles, San Fernando Valley, San Gabriel Valley, Pasadena, Burbank, Glendale, Arcadia, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, Long Beach, Orange County, Ventura County, San Bernardino, and throughout California.

Recent Posts

  • How to determine which costs are allowable in connection with an anti-SLAPP motion July 18, 2022
  • Should a court consider a plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in determining how much to award in fees for the defendant following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 28, 2022
  • May a trial court consider a defendant’s “walk away” offer when determining the reasonableness of fees following a successful anti-SLAPP motion? June 24, 2022
  • Does a claim for intentional physical distress exist under California law? June 20, 2022

Copyright © 2025 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in